The Chinese authorities might be using the possibility of legal demonstrations as a ploy to capture refractory citizens and punish them.
Read yesterday: Elderly women to be 're-educated' for Olympic protest.
Read today: Too Old and Frail to Re-educate? Not in China.
Excerpts:
«The two women, both in their late 70s, have never spoken out against China’s authoritarian government. [...] But the Beijing police still sentenced the two women to an extrajudicial term of “re-education through labor” this week for applying to hold a legal protest in a designated area in Beijing, where officials promised that Chinese could hold demonstrations during the Olympic Games. [...]
It is unclear why the police have detained people who sought permission to protest. Some political analysts say the police may be refusing to enforce the government’s order, announced last month, to allow protest zones. Chinese lawyers and human rights advocates also suggested a more cynical motivation — that the authorities were using the possibility of legal demonstrations as a ploy to lure restive citizens into declaring their intention to protest, allowing the police to take action against them.
[...] “In order to ensure smooth traffic flow, a nice environment and good social order, we will invite these participants to hold their demonstrations in designated places,” Liu Shaowu, the security director for Beijing’s Olympic organizing committee, said at a news conference. He described the creation of three so-called protest zones and suggested that a simple application process would provide Chinese citizens an avenue for free expression, a right that has long been enshrined in China’s Constitution but in reality is rarely granted.
But with four days left before the closing ceremony, the authorities acknowledge that they have yet to allow a single protest. They claim that most of the people who filed applications had their grievances addressed, obviating the need for a public expression of discontent.
[...] Li Fangping, a lawyer who has been arrested and beaten for his dogged representation of rights advocates, said there was no way the government would allow protesters to expose some of China’s most vexing problems, among them systemic corruption, environmental degradation and the forced relocation of hundreds of thousands of residents for projects related to the Olympics.
[...] In theory, the Communist Party allows citizens to lobby the central government on matters of local corruption, the illegal seizure of land and extralegal detentions. In reality, those who arrive at Beijing’s petition office are often met at the door by plainclothes officers who stop them from filing their complaints and then bundle them back to their hometowns. Intimidation, beatings and administrative detentions are often enough to prevent them from trying again.
[...] On Monday, when they returned to the police station to follow up on their protest applications, the women were told they had been sentenced to one year at a labor camp for “disturbing public order.” For the moment, the women have been allowed to return to their homes, but they have been warned that they could be sent to a detention center at any moment, relatives said.»
This is China. The cretinoids impose sanctions too all kind of countries, often for invented reasons, but not to China.
This kind of China is the creation of the rapacious corporations, mostly American, who have moved their production out there.
Comments are closed, complaints to info@.


1 comment
Acquiescence of crimes against the people do not only stem from corporations but also their political leaders which have been entrusted to protect its citizens. In the u.s. criminal behaviour is often ignored by the politicians when it favors corporations. The fda ignores the import of defective products from china, case in point-the lead and chemical infected toy industry. The u.s.p.t.o granting vague software patents thereby stifling innovation, encouraging a "money for nothing" attitude through theft of ideas, other people's prior work (plagiarism at-its-best; change one line of code and it's yours), if you can spin and lie your way through the judicial system.