I am so bored by the plethora of so-called “news” (and “advancements”) in the Linux distroland… Say, Pardus 2009 receives warm praises, but it also means that there is no way back to KDE 3.5, the graphical package manager still doesn’t have an option to show ALL the packages (installed or not), and apparently removing a package doesn’t remove the dependencies, leaving orphans. Oh my…
Then, I don’t understand what’s the fuss about what default desktop environment is openSUSE going to have: it’s only natural for it to be KDE4 (SuSE has always been a pro-KDE distro)! What matters is what will SLED have as defaults, but SLED11 is still fresh, and by the time SLED12 is born, all kind of things can happen…
I am personally puzzled about the future of GNOME (they recently showed signs of a particular form of idiocy), and now that Mutter is Metacity3, I expect its quality and stability to decrease. Will it have some kind of plasmoids too?
Of course, there is no risk for RHEL6 to include a really broken GNOME… should it release some day. The problem I see with RHEL6 is that it should include KDE4 by default (all the KDE/Qt-related spec files from Fedora/EPEL show that intention, i.e. “kde” is KDE4 and “kde3″ is legacy for RHEL6), but KDE4 is still not enterprise-grade. What’s going to be included with RHEL6, and why is the release date for its first Beta such a well-kept secret?!
KDE4 gradually improves, but it’s still something clumsy (I can’t get used with the plasmoids), incomplete, and it still crashes the same way KDE3 crashed years ago. I thought KDE4 was totally rewritten in such a way that SIGSEGV wouldn’t happen. After all, Windows Vista is “bad” (maybe it really is so, I can’t tell as I am not using it), but at least its components don’t crash! Eh?!
Don’t tell me that XFCE 4.6.1 is the path to the future. I am not buying it… nor would I buy a Mac! (FreeBSD, PC-BSD and OpenSolaris are even less likely to gain momentum in the foreseeable future.)
DWW Issue 315 includes in the comment #27 something that summarize the reasons for I despise whatever I despise: «The recent Intel graphics issue has made it a pain to find a good distro that works…».
So, faute de mieux, my “free Windows XP” is the choice of EL clones: CentOS 5.3 and Scientific Linux 5.3.
But I still suspect that Windows 7 will sell quite well, actually. Sigh. Could the Linux crowd be responsible in part for this situation? Constantly broken X drivers, constantly inferior wireless support, stupid KDE4, stupid GNOME3 in sight, mediocre XFCE, etc. etc.
Rant over.